Today I'm unfortunately hampered by travel, spotty internet connections, and time with friends and family. So I won't be able to update the blog beyond this post.
But the series on the Bayesian evaluation of Jesus's resurrection continues to go well, and I'm constantly finding new ways to test its components. I aim to finish the first round of edits by Easter this year, which I'm looking forward to.
You may next want to read:
For Christmas: the Incarnation
Christmas and time
Another post, from the table of contents
Blog pages
▼
Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 33)
I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.
Things are edited down to "Or actively deceptive?"
You may next want to read:
"Simon, son of John, do you love me?"
Jesus is like these things in his incarnate nature:
Another post, from the table of contents
Things are edited down to "Or actively deceptive?"
You may next want to read:
"Simon, son of John, do you love me?"
Jesus is like these things in his incarnate nature:
Another post, from the table of contents
Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 32)
I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.
Things are edited down to "Could the disciples have been genuinely mistaken? (part 6)"
You may next want to read:
Human laws, natural laws, and the Fourth of July
On becoming a good person
Another post, from the table of contents
Things are edited down to "Could the disciples have been genuinely mistaken? (part 6)"
You may next want to read:
Human laws, natural laws, and the Fourth of July
On becoming a good person
Another post, from the table of contents
Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection (edit 31)
I'm continuing to work on editing Bayesian evaluation for the likelihood of Christ's resurrection.
Things are edited down to "Can human testimonies be trusted?"
You may next want to read:
Why we should interpret the Bible in light of science
Jesus is like these things in his incarnate nature:
Another post, from the table of contents
Things are edited down to "Can human testimonies be trusted?"
You may next want to read:
Why we should interpret the Bible in light of science
Jesus is like these things in his incarnate nature:
Another post, from the table of contents